Category: Lab Best Practice

Why Sample Preparation Is the Most Overlooked Step in Grain Analysis

Laboratories invest heavily in state-of-the-art analysers — and rightly so. But the quality of any analytical result is fundamentally limited by the quality of the sample presented to that analyser. In grain and flour quality control, sample preparation is the most underinvested and underappreciated part of the testing process. The Milling Step: Why It Matters Most flour laboratory tests — Falling Number, Gluten Index, Alveograph, Farinograph — are performed on flour milled from whole wheat. The laboratory mill used for this purpose has a direct influence on results. Particle size distribution, damaged starch levels, and even temperature during milling all affect the performance of the resulting flour in subsequent tests. Standard laboratory mills for grain analysis include the Brabender Quadrumat Junior, the Bühler MLU-202, and the Perten LM 3100. Each produces a slightly different flour fraction. Comparing results between laboratories using different mills requires careful harmonisation. Dividing the Sample Representatively Before milling, a bulk grain sample must be reduced to a laboratory sub-sample without introducing bias. Hand scooping from the top of a bag is not acceptable — it will almost always over-represent lighter, lower-quality grain that has risen to the surface. A rotary sample divider or riffle box divides the sample randomly and representatively, regardless of grain heterogeneity. Conditioning Before Milling Tempering grain to a standard moisture level before milling is critical for reproducible flour yield and particle size. Most standard methods specify tempering to 15.5% moisture for one hour before milling. Skipping this step, or rushing it, introduces both between-run and between-laboratory variability that cannot be corrected downstream. Cleaning and Cross-Contamination Laboratory mills must be thoroughly cleaned between samples. Residual flour from a high-protein wheat sample will inflate the protein reading of the next soft wheat sample run through the same mill. Clean the mill with a small cleaning sample (which is discarded) between each production sample. Fuhler Labor offers pre-owned laboratory mills and sample preparation equipment from leading manufacturers, all verified to be in working order prior to listing.

5 Common Mistakes in Flour Laboratory Testing (and How to Avoid Them)

Even the best laboratory equipment produces unreliable results if the testing procedure is flawed. After years of working with flour and grain laboratories, we have seen the same errors appear repeatedly — often in facilities that consider themselves well-equipped. Here are the five most common testing mistakes and the practical steps to eliminate them. 1. Inconsistent Sample Conditioning Most flour laboratory tests are highly sensitive to moisture content. Failing to condition samples to a standard moisture level (typically 14% for wheat flour) before testing introduces systematic variability. Always use a conditioning chamber and allow adequate equilibration time — a minimum of 2 hours, preferably overnight for cold samples arriving from storage. 2. Skipping Instrument Warm-Up Electronic laboratory instruments — particularly NIR analysers and Falling Number units — require warm-up periods for their heating elements, electronics, and optics to stabilise. Running tests immediately after switching on the instrument is a common source of outlier results. Follow manufacturer warm-up specifications religiously. 3. Neglecting Reference Sample Checks Running certified reference materials at the start of each testing session is the only reliable way to verify that an instrument is performing within specification. Many laboratories skip this step to save time — and then spend far more time investigating unexpected results. A simple daily check with one certified reference takes less than five minutes and protects every result that follows. 4. Poorly Maintained Sieves and Consumables For gluten washing and sedimentation tests, damaged or clogged sieves are a frequent source of error. Sieves should be inspected regularly under magnification, replaced on a scheduled basis, and never cleaned with abrasive materials. Similarly, Falling Number viscometer tubes should be inspected for scratches, which alter fluid dynamics and introduce measurement bias. 5. Inadequate Sample Homogeneity A 10-gram sub-sample for a Falling Number test must be truly representative of the lot being assessed. Failing to properly mix and split bulk samples before sub-sampling is one of the most common root causes of between-laboratory discrepancies. Use a rotary divider or riffle splitter to ensure representative sub-samples, particularly for heterogeneous grain lots with potential sprouting pockets.

Select the fields to be shown. Others will be hidden. Drag and drop to rearrange the order.
  • Image
  • SKU
  • Rating
  • Price
  • Stock
  • Availability
  • Add to cart
  • Description
  • Content
  • Weight
  • Dimensions
  • Additional information
Click outside to hide the comparison bar
Compare